Built for long / short equity funds

Where investment conviction meets discipline.

Document your thesis before capital moves. Track your process, not just your P&L. Build a research layer that compounds with every position.

View pricing →
Decision Canvas
Breaking the Bank of England, Soros 1992

The research layer

Morning Brief

Tuesday, Jun 17

Daily Brief

Daily Market Thesis

Risk-off tone persisting despite headline CPI beat. Real yields still elevated — the market is pricing a higher-for-longer outcome that compresses multiples in unprofitable tech. Semis showing relative strength but volume is thin. Not chasing.

Key Facts

• UST 10y: 4.82% • HYG spread: +185bps • VIX: 18.4, trending up • DXY: 106.1, breaking out

Daily Playbook

#
Ticker
Setup
Buy Zone
Rationale
1
NVDA
Breakout retest
118–121
AI capex cycle intact. 50d holding as support on volume.
2
INTC
Earnings gap fill
29–31
Structurally weak. Short any rally into overhead supply.
3
TLT
Range breakdown
84–86
Duration short. Higher-for-longer confirmed by PCE data.
Position Thesis
LONGNVDA

AI infrastructure buildout is a multi-year capex supercycle. Hyperscalers are locked into GPU roadmaps 3–4 quarters out. Blackwell demand structurally exceeds supply. No credible alternative at scale.

Key Facts

H100/H200 sold out. $40B+ backlog. Data center revenue 87% of mix. Gross margins 78.4%.

Sizing & Exit

Full position at current levels. Add on any pullback to 50d. Thesis breaks if hyperscaler capex guidance cuts >15%.

SHORTINTC

Terminal market share erosion. AMD winning enterprise server. ARM cannibalizing client. Foundry turnaround requires capital Intel cannot generate internally. No catalyst to re-rate.

Key Facts

Data center share at 15yr low. Foundry losing $7B/yr. Cash burn accelerating. Gelsinger options exhausted.

Sizing & Exit

Short on rallies above $33. Cover near $22 — trough multiple on depressed earnings.

Investment Process
Process
1

Every position requires a written thesis before capital is committed.

2

Thesis must include a specific invalidation condition — not a price stop.

3

No position exceeds 5% gross without IC approval.

Risk
4

Gross exposure cap: 200%. Net exposure range: -30% to +60%.

5

Single-name drawdown of 15% triggers a mandatory thesis review.

Discipline
6

Never add to a position to average down. Size is set at initiation.

Playbook

Earnings Dislocation

Event-drivenLong

77%

22 trades · 2.4R

Stock gaps down on good results due to crowded positioning. Buy the dislocation within 48hrs as fast money unwinds.

Crowded Short Squeeze

TechnicalShort cover

64%

14 trades · 2.9R

High short interest + borrow cost spike + catalyst. Cover before the squeeze is consensus.

Macro Regime Short

MacroShort

68%

31 trades · 1.9R

Rising real yields + DXY strength targeting rate-sensitive, unprofitable tech with high duration.

Research Assistant

Does my watchlist today actually connect to my thesis?

Mostly yes — but INTC is the weak link. Your thesis says risk-off and real yields elevated, but INTC is in your watchlist as a long breakout. That's a duration-sensitive name going against your macro view. NVDA and TLT both fit. INTC needs a separate rationale or should come off the list.

Which of my rules does today's plan conflict with?

One conflict: Rule 3 says 'no position without a written invalidation condition.' Your NVDA watchlist entry has a buy zone and setup, but no invalidation. What specifically would prove the thesis wrong?